Romney Obama Debate Swings Romney's Way

The Republican Party gained a small amount of momentum Wednesday night when the Romney Obama debate was decidedly won by Mitt Romney. Even Obama supporters admitted that the President slid back a few points in the ratings after the debate that was watched by over 50 million viewers. Over 25% of the debate focused on Medicaid and healthcare, and although some light was shed on the topic, neither party could produce any concrete solutions, but rather delved into the specifics without providing any resolutions in the end. As most Americans are well aware ever since John Kennedy stole a sure victory out from under incumbent President Nixon in the 1960 Presidential debate, the Obama Romney debate was a very important victory for the Republicans. Although there is still almost no chance of a Republican victory in the 2012 Election, the Republican Party looks like it's going to at least show up this year to the fight. The 2008 Presidential Election was a complete joke, as the Republicans put up the two most incredibly incompetent and ridiculous nominees they could find. Mitt Romney, although he will most certainly lose, shows some promise at least.

Most Americans are under the false impression that voting Republican is voting for the rich, and that is a bad thing. This is the wrong process of thinking about what the Republican Party represents. Yes, the Republicans support the captains of industry who pay most of the Nations salaries, and support businesses who create jobs, and justly reward those business owners in the process. Republicans who are wealthy include people like the founder of Black and Veatch, a locally owned Kansas City corporation that provides THOUSANDS of jobs. Republicans that are wealthy include the founder of Children's Mercy Hospital, who BUILT A CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL. Do they deserve to be wealthy? HELL YES. How many welfare collecting Democrats out there do you know who either provide thousands of jobs or have started children's hospitals? The answer = ZERO. So before you think you are a Democrat you might want to think about who is on your team and whether or not you want to be wearing the same color jersey. You'd better support the captains of industry who are most likely employing you right now. We need our rich people to stay rich. That is how jobs are created and that is how children's hospitals are built - get with it people.

What the American people must realize is that they are most likely working for a company who was founded and is now run by just such individuals, and by protecting those business owners and CEOs, they are in a sense giving you job security.

The Four Basic Food Groups of Poor People
Stop and think about your job. Do you work at WalMart? Do you work for or own a gas station? Do you work for or own a check cashing place? Do you work for or own a liquor store? These are the only businesses that benefit from poor people and people on welfare. Unless you work for one of these "four basic food groups" of the poor people on welfare who vote Democrat, then you should be voting Republican. If you don't work for one of those institutions, your salary is being paid by the wealthy. It's a shock, we know, but it is a FACT. You have to support the people who are supporting you, and if you work for any company besides the types listed above, you are being supported by the rich, and you need your rich people to stay rich so that they can afford to continue to employ you. If you vote Democrat, you might just be voting yourself out of a job.

With a small victory by the Republicans in the Romney Obama debate, we may just see a closer election this year, but the victory will almost certainly go to the Democrats once again. This, of course, will continue to promote unemployment, as the Democrats love to hand out welfare checks, and encourage the poor to continue to multiply carelessly without any means to support their multiple children and rely on the government and the working middle class to pay for them and their children while they sit at home watching Springer. A few more years of this and we're moving to Canada.

Romney Obama debate 2012 by KCMB Kansas City News, official kc news site with breaking stories on The Kansas City Royals, Chiefs, charity events, the 2012 MLB All Star Game, weather, sports, MU, KU, ufo sightings, dui checkpoints, Kansas City neighborhoods, nightlife, concerts, the Sprint Center, the Power and Light District and current Kansas City news articles.

O'Reilly Obama Interview Superbowl Sunday

President Obama and Bill O'Reilly sit down and discuss politics, policy, the pressures of being the President and or course, the Super Bowl.
by Kansas City News

The interview between Bill O'Reilly and President Obama during the Super Bowl pregame show showed us a side of Barack Obama that seems a little tired of being president.  Who could blame him?  When asked what the hardest part of being the President was for him, Barack replied "well, the fact that I'm sitting here wearing a sport jacket on Super Bowl Sunday."  I did not vote for Obama, and it is pretty clear that the writers of this blog are not Obama or Democrat supporters in majority.  But I must admit that I'm starting to like Obama as a person.  I don't like everything that Obama sends down the wire politically, but just like former President Bush, Obama is starting to look like a guy that just wants to hang out with his friends, drink beer, smoke a cigarettes, and just rap about guy stuff.  I'm all about that.

Obama looked irritated and weary during the interview, and he made it clear that he would rather be doing something more casual.  He quickly answered Bill O'Reilly's questions almost before they even came out of Bill's mouth, cutting O'Reilly off often and obviously trying to hurry through this interview.  On the other side, it was clear that Bill O'Reilly was trying to make more of the interview than necessary, probably for ratings or whatever, and tried several times to "bully" Obama.  Bill even mentioned gravely and snobbishly that Obama wasn't wearing a tie.  There's conservative, and then there's irritating asshole - and I think that Bill O'Reilly is definitely leaning toward the latter.  Here's a little piece from the interview:

O'Reilly:  "Does it bother you that so many people hate you?"
Obama:  "The people who dislike you, don't know you.  It's that simple, what most people hate about me is whatever "fun house mirror" image of you that's out there.  You don't take it seriously.  To get to be the President in this country you have to have pretty tough skin."

O'Reilly:  "What is the thing that has suprised you the most about this job?"
Obama:  "The thing that you realize intellectually after actually taking office is that every problem that comes to my desk has no easy answer.  All of the easy problems get solved somewhere else down the line.  The problems that make their way on to my desk either have no answer at all, or they require me to make a decision that is going to upset someone or disrupt some part of industry or business."

Obama ends the interview by pointing out something that my father (a man who's intelligence level I have never encountered outside of my home) pointed out to me after I was disappointed in Obama's election.  What my dad and Obama pointed out was that "although we fight back and forth over issues in this country, with Democrats and Republicans, left and right, whatever, America has a common sense of decency that makes me optimistic about our future even on the worst days."  This statement is my new political affiliation, and from now on I'm going to believe that Americans are mostly good at heart and that eventually they will come together and steer the country in the right direction.